1997-02-05                     House Journal                      Page 0246
HB 2                                                                         
Representative Kubina moved and asked unanimous consent that the               
reconsideration of CSHB 2(FIN) (page 245) be taken up on the same              
day.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                             
                                                                               
The following was again before the House in third reading:                     
                                                                               
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2(FIN)                                                  
An Act allowing, for the purposes of permanent fund dividend                  
eligibility, an individual to accompany, as the spouse or minor or             
disabled dependent, another eligible resident who is absent for any            
of the following reasons:  vocational, professional, or other                  
specific education for which a comparable program is not                       
reasonably available in the state; secondary or postsecondary                  
education; military service; medical treatment; service in the                 
Congress or in the peace corps; to care for the individual's                   
terminally ill parent, spouse, sibling, child, or stepchild; for up to         
220 days to settle the estate of the individual's deceased parent,             
spouse, sibling, child, or stepchild; to care for a parent, spouse,            
sibling, child, or stepchild with a critical life-threatening illness          
whose treatment plan, as recommended by the attending physician,               

1997-02-05                     House Journal                      Page 0247
HB 2                                                                         
requires travel outside of the state for treatment at a medical               
speciality complex; or other reasons that the commissioner of                  
revenue may establish by regulation; requiring, for the purposes of            
permanent fund dividend eligibility, a state resident to have the              
intent to remain indefinitely; relating to the eligibility for 1992,           
1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997 permanent fund dividends of                   
certain spouses and dependents of eligible applicants; and                     
providing for an effective date.                                               
                                                                               
The question to be reconsidered:  Shall CSHB 2(FIN) pass the                   
House?  The roll was taken with the following result:                          
                                                                               
CSHB 2(FIN)--RECONSIDERATION                                                   
Third Reading                                                                  
Final Passage                                                                  
                                                                               
YEAS:  38   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Austerman, Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cowdery, Croft,             
Davies, Davis, Elton, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hodgins,             
Hudson, Ivan, James, Joule, Kelly, Kemplen, Kookesh, Kott, Kubina,             
Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Ogan, Phillips, Porter,                
Rokeberg, Ryan, Sanders, Therriault, Vezey, Williams                           
                                                                               
Excused:  Dyson, Kohring                                                       
                                                                               
And so, CSHB 2(FIN) passed the House on reconsideration.                       
                                                                               
Representative Porter moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll          
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.           
                                                                               
                                                                               
CSHB 2(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.